🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.